| Finished | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_cnt_to_cutoff_value_2 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.42 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 40154 W: 10019 L: 10073 D: 20062 Ptnml(0-2): 100, 4802, 10299, 4804, 72 | try !cutnode instead of extension |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_cnt_to_cutoff_value | diff | 40.0+0.40 | LLR: -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 98912 W: 23928 L: 23849 D: 51135 Ptnml(0-2): 41, 11143, 26999, 11242, 31 | Merge branch 'main' into cutoff_cnt_to_cutoff_value |
| DanSam | Reckless | segment_corrhist_1 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -1.08 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 2756 W: 658 L: 716 D: 1382 Ptnml(0-2): 11, 357, 692, 315, 3 | Try segment corrhist (4x4) area key near our king |
| DanSam | Reckless | small_probcut_1 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 15040 W: 3697 L: 3797 D: 7546 Ptnml(0-2): 39, 1832, 3891, 1706, 52 | try small probcut idea variant - not that "agressive" (tt_depth >= depth - 2) |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_cnt_to_cutoff_value | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: 2.90 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 69652 W: 17518 L: 17198 D: 34936 Ptnml(0-2): 152, 8026, 18152, 8342, 154 | Use "weights" for cutoff count instead of incrementing 1 |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_cnt_next_cutnode | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.37 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 17384 W: 4258 L: 4357 D: 8769 Ptnml(0-2): 28, 2077, 4585, 1970, 32 | Increase reduction in the cutoff count reduction if the next node is cutnode (FDS) |
| DanSam | Reckless | probcut_cutoff_cnt_inc | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.29 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 16884 W: 4098 L: 4195 D: 8591 Ptnml(0-2): 27, 2080, 4331, 1971, 33 | Increment cutoff count in the probcut |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_hist_3 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.34 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 15878 W: 3963 L: 4067 D: 7848 Ptnml(0-2): 55, 1930, 4072, 1828, 54 | try 1:1 implementation of the idea (https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6971d6b712ee1f6231b97369) |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutnode_corr_2 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.29 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 6158 W: 1453 L: 1568 D: 3137 Ptnml(0-2): 14, 727, 1704, 628, 6 | |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutnode_corr_2 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.43 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 20142 W: 4954 L: 5050 D: 10138 Ptnml(0-2): 55, 2296, 5455, 2220, 45 | 3171793 |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutnode_corr_2 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 12086 W: 2993 L: 3100 D: 5993 Ptnml(0-2): 29, 1509, 3074, 1402, 29 | |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutnode_corr | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 26810 W: 6679 L: 6753 D: 13378 Ptnml(0-2): 69, 3209, 6944, 3093, 90 | different bonus formula for cutnode corrhist + use it to adjust nmp threshold |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutnode_corr | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 11516 W: 2773 L: 2882 D: 5861 Ptnml(0-2): 35, 1432, 2932, 1325, 34 | add seperate correction history for cutnodes |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutnode_corr | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.27 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 10518 W: 2605 L: 2713 D: 5200 Ptnml(0-2): 21, 1278, 2761, 1186, 13 | allow more nmp if we have overall good information about the current cutnode |
| DanSam | Reckless | nmp_hist_2 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.27 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 13280 W: 3288 L: 3393 D: 6599 Ptnml(0-2): 42, 1619, 3416, 1528, 35 | take 2 - adjust division constant to 128 |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_hist_2 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.50 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 6180 W: 1446 L: 1578 D: 3156 Ptnml(0-2): 11, 798, 1604, 666, 11 | take 2 - adjust division constant to 256 |
| DanSam | Reckless | nmp_hist_1 | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.37 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 59788 W: 14917 L: 14925 D: 29946 Ptnml(0-2): 136, 7117, 15408, 7085, 148 | Null move history for adjusting nmp threshold |
| DanSam | Reckless | cutoff_hist | diff | 8.0+0.08 | LLR: -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 3.00] Games: 7822 W: 1897 L: 2012 D: 3913 Ptnml(0-2): 19, 982, 2023, 869, 18 | Cutoffhistory for rfp |